this is somerset - news, sport, entertainment, jobs, homes and cars
Hello Guest   [ Log in ]    JOBS  |   MOTORS  |   PROPERTY  
   Home
   Service Directory
   Bath Chronicle
   Bridgwater Times
   Burnham Times
   Central Somerset Gaz
   Clevedon Mercury
News
Headlines
Business
Education
Health
Politics
Sport
Letters
Join the Sam the Bear Club
Contact the Newspaper
Clevedon Tide Times
Email the Editor
   Frome Standard
   Shepton Mallet Journal
   Somerset Guardian
   Wells Journal
   Weston & Worle News
   Western Daily Press
   Western Gazette
   National News
   National Sport
   Somerset CCC
   Entertainment
   Dining Out
   Days Out
   Competitions
   Local Information
   Services and Info
   The Beehive
   Interact
 Search this Site:
   Search
Holidays
Flights and Hotels
Teletext Games
Personal Finance
Cut Your Bills
National Lottery
Dating
Start a Lifelist
RSS Feeds
Video Bulletins
Podcasts
Photo Slideshows
Live Traffic and Travel

This week's papers


Have your say
Write a letter to the editor
Vote on our opinion polls

Interact
Sign up for daily emails
Sign up for newsflashes
Order a copy of the newspaper


Display an easily printable version of
						this story

Email this story to anyone you like
GREEN BELT PLANS FOR RAILWAY
Next Story | Previous Story | Back to list

18:00 - 25 January 2007
Land taken out of the Green Belt at Portbury could get the Portishead Railway project back on track, according to one campaigner.

Alistair Lindsay, aged 22, of Clevedon, said the site near junction 19 of the M5 could be used for a car park to serve a station at Portbury.

The rail enthusiast believes it would be easier to get funding to reopen the railway in stages, starting with a link between Portbury and Ashton Gate.

That would be followed by re-laying three miles of track and building a station in Portishead, followed by extending services into central Bristol, possibly to Wapping Wharf, near the Industrial Museum and ultimately to Temple Meads.

The land at Portbury was controversially removed from the Green Belt in November on the assumption it would be designated for the expansion of Royal Portbury Dock.

But Alistair said if it was going to be used to park cars it would be better off being used to take cars off the road and provide the impetus to get the rail project off the ground.

Alistair, who works in insurance, says he has been presenting his work to a number of transport groups and reopening the branch line between Portishead and Bristol is now on Transport 2000's manifesto.

He said: "The problems of getting out of Portishead in the morning are well documented and running the railway into the heart of Portishead is the best solution.

"But getting the funding for the whole project has been a major stumbling block.

"If we start small and have stations at Portbury, Pill and Ashton Gate we will immediately take cars off the road and, once part of the route is operating, it will be easier to get investment to reopen the whole line."

Alistair thought the first phase would cost less than half of the projected cost of £13 million to open the whole line.

The advantages of initially running from Portbury to Ashton Gate are that the track is already in place and expensive upgrading of signalling at Parsons Street and Temple Meads won't have to be made.

Alan Matthews, chairman of Portishead Railway Group, said he thought there was a lot of merit in Alistair's plan, if all the stages could be delivered.

He said: "Fundamentally our group wants the railway to run from the centre of Portishead to the centre of Bristol.

"But if this helps us to reach that goal then we would be happy to back it."

Alistair, who is responsible for transport policy within the North Somerset Labour Party, added that plans were at an early stage and extensive talks would be needed with the Portbury Dock freight operator EWS, Network Rail, First Great Western, councils and other stakeholders.

He said: "There is obviously a lot of work to do but there is vast potential for the line and it urgently needs to be reopened."

 
  Next Story | Previous Story | Back to list
  • Copyright |
  • Disclaimer |
  • Privacy statement |
  • Contact the Website | Work for us